Sexual slavery and it’s ties to the scourge of polygamy throughout history and into the 21st century

ruuuuuuttttt

Sexual slavery throughout history

*

Raptio is an ancient Latin term that refers to the large-scale abduction of women.

Raptio describes a long-tradition in
the tribalistic, non monogamous, third world culture of the kidnapping of women for marriage, enslavement or sexual slavery, most frequently in a time of war. The practice of the large-scale abduction of women dates back the beginnings of recorded history.

*

Neolithic Period

*

Excavation of pottery near Asparn-Schletz, Austria, provides evidence of the widespread murder of older men and women during the Neolithic Period but not young adult women and children. This suggests that raiders attacked populations and killed everybody except nubile females, who were abducted and brought back as the spoils of war.

*

Genetic evidence of Raptio

*
There is even genetic evidence to suggest that the abduction and enslavement of women was a common practice among primitive tribal societies. In historical migrations, groups of raiding male armies routinely abducted indigenous females, a concept that is backed up by the greater stability of the human mitochondrial DNA haplogroups as compared to the human Y-chomosone
DNA haplogroups. In other words, the “mitochondrial Eve” chromosome is estimated to be about 140,000 years old, compared to the “mitochondrial Adam Y chromosome”, which is only about 60,000 years old.

*

Raptio in the 21st century and the sociopathic-inducing scourge of polygamy

*

CLICK TO READ MORE ABOUT THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE SCOURGE OF THE THROWAWAYS OF POLYGAMY AND THE ABOMINATION OF SLAVERY; SEXUAL SLAVERY AND JUST PLAIN OLD ORDINARY SLAVERY IN THE 21st CENTURY

As long as polygamy is a status symbol for wealthy elites to acquire more than their fair share of young females, any culture that practices the abominable scourge of polygamy will be violent, miserable, destabilized, and dysfunctional.

Why Polygamy is the Source of the World’s Terrorism

aaaaaaaaaaadevilaa

Why Polygamy is the Source of the World’s TerrorismChina and India are two of the most successful cultures in the world today in terms of economic growth and improving the quality of life for their citizens. It’s no accident that both nations have long practiced power monogamy.  People there must marry for life. There’s no such things like divorce and infidelity is not tolerated.

In the ancient world the benefits of monogamy were practiced erratically.
The power of monogamy  slowly spread across Europe and it’s inherent values of hard work, lifelong commitment to children, and self-discipline to cultures throughout the world.

 ‘

What Happened?

Continue reading

The second worst fathering on the planet is in America’s inner cities

scan0002_7

Most all if not all the product of fractured fathering.

The problem with street violence and gang violence of this magnitude isn’t the police, or America or Israel or whitey or whatever.

The problem is catastrophic fractured fathering of generations of tribalistic polygamy.

Most could be avoided by nurturing, caring, exceptionalist fathers

 

Sexual slavery, lost boy throwaways, false narratives of supremacism to justify slavery

Throughout history slavery has been justified by false narratives of tribal warlords, monarchs, oligarchs, and the elites of polygamy who need more girls for themselves.  If the throwaways of polygamy who are without women are taking sex slaves, then it’s time to banish the scourge of polygamy

There is no justification in the 21st century for any form of slavery.  Especially sexual slavery so that the polygamous elites have more girls for themselves.

Polygamous Nations Do Not Want “Refugees” from other Polygamous Nations. Hmmmmmmm

scan0010.2

Surprise, surprise, the polygamous nations of Indonesia and Malaysia do not want refugees in their countries..  Aren’t these their “brothers”?

Indonesia sent three warships and a plane to turn away “migrant” boats.

Now why could that be?

Can it be that the polygamous countries have their own excess young “lost boy” throwaway males?  Can it be that the polygamous countries have a shortage of young females?  Young females that the older elites want for themselves?  Do they know that offal of polygamy wreaks destabilizing havoc wherever they go?

Polygamous country of Indonesia sends three warships and a plane to turn away migrant boats. Overloaded vessels are not being allowed to enter territorial waters.

read more

Disrespect for all females and for all outside your tribe

LiveLeak-dot-com-80e_1423104671-fsaratt_1423104676-e1423123139248

*

Disrespect for females is a matter of course in the world of tribalistic polygamy of both inner city America and international terrorism

Underlying all forms of polygamy is sado sexual violence and domestic violence and just plain old ordinary everyday violence towards women and children and all others.

One of the great catastrophes of the scourge of polygamy is keeping females uneducated, locked away and isolated.  At the same time, throwaway low status male youths are isolated from normal heterosexual social contacts at the critical time their sexual identity is being formed, thus opening the door to confused sexuality.

Young males that are hypersexualized while being isolated from normal female relationships and from those outside the tribe are fodder for terrorist groomers.

*

 Disrespect for females is a core problem.

There are many parallels with the mindless violence prevalent in our inner cities.   Many studies examine early childhood sexuality and how critical it is to a well adjusted child through to adulthood.

*

Gender identity and sexuality begins in infancy.

Gender identity and sexuality does not start at puberty and adolescence.  By then it’s too late.  Children begin showing sexual interest functioning beginning in infancy.

read more at  http://www.bhcmhmr.org/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=12771&cn=462

rockkkkkkkk

Respect for females and all others is at the core of the remarkable power of exceptionalist monogamy.  Children of exceptionalism of all colors and all belief systems would NEVER EVER be allowed to throw rocks at anyone for any reason.  Or want to, for that matter.  Or engage in depraved beheadings.

*

The second worst fathering on the planet is in inner city America.

ferguson

Some of the Worst Fathering on the Planet

Baltimore, Ferguson, Chicago, Detroit, the list goes on and on…. The vast majority of rioters who burned, looted and threw rocks were young African-American inner city males.

*

Where were their fathers?

We saw traumatized mothers trying to save their sons, but no fathers
The Family Research Council’s Marriage and Religion Research Institute reports that only 16 percent of 15- to 17-year-old teens in Baltimore have been raised in an intact, married family.  (That adds up to 84% teens raised in the dysfunction and violence and chaos of tribalistic polygamy.)
It names Baltimore as being “one of the five least intact counties of America,” along with Cuyahoga, Ohio; the Bronx, N.Y.; the District of Columbia; and Shelby County, Tenn.
Broken fathering is a problem in white and Latino and Asian and all communities but it is endemic in inner city America.

*

First the Truth Hurts and then the Truth Heals

The first step is to take responsibility.  If some of the worst fathering on the planet is in inner city America, it’s time to face up to the truth, and the truth hurts.

But then it heals.

*

The one and only answer:

The Power of Exceptionalist Monogamy

Wisdom from a great Black American Exceptionalist in Baltimore

Dr. Carson is a leader, unlike the demagogues who are keeping black America in a state of violent, low functioning, broken fathering of non monogamy.

Words of wisdom in Baltimore today, from a great black American exceptionalist…

Carson emphasized the dangers of blaming police instead of taking responsibility for self created problems:

“What we don’t want to happen (is) we beat up on the police all the time, and they get to the point where they second guess themselves and they become timid, and then it endangers them and it also endangers the people they are supposed to be protecting, so that ends up being a worse situation.”

He will make his world a better place for all

 

More evidence that polygamy causes world poverty

aa139382126

How 50 Years of Exceptionalist Monogamy Powered Singapore’s Flourishing Economy

*

History of Polygamy in Singapore
Up until about 50 years ago, polygamy was not only legal in Singapore, it was also quite common. After independence from Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had high levels of unemployment and poverty.  70 percent of Singapore’s households lived in overcrowded conditions, and a third of its people subsisted  in slums on the city fringes.  Half of the population was illiterate.

*

The Last 50 Years

In the last 50 years, Singapore’s economy has soared while surrounding polygamous economies remain mired in poverty and malfunction.

Singapore’s economy has been ranked as the most open in the world, one of the least corrupt and most pro-business and has the third highest per capitia GDP  in the world

As recently as the 1950s, polygamy was considered a “privilege” that men were allowed to enjoy without legal or social persecution. It was only when the Women’s Charter was passed in 1961 that strict limits were put on the practice of one man having more than one wife.
Prior to the second half of the 20th Century, the status of men in Singapore was often related to the number of wives he had. Men who were wealthy and powerful could afford to maintain a household with many different wives, while poor men or those with lower social status typically would have only one wife or, more commonly, none at all.
This led to a type of societal instability because lower status men without wives were more willing to engage in risky behavior in order to achieve status, power or even sex. The result was a higher than normal murder rate, as well as an increase in rape, kidnapping of women, sexual slavery, and prostitution.
There also was a higher rate of substance abuse among lower-income men.

*
The Women’s Charter of 1961
The Women’s Charter of 1961 provided for the institution of monogamous marriages, as well as allowing for the individual rights of husbands and wives, the protection of the family, and the legal requirements for divorce and separation.
The law was championed by Madam Chan Choy Siong, who was the wife of former Cabinet Minister Ong Pang Boon. Madam Siong argued successfully that the existing laws that allowed polygamy violated the rights of women.
In a famously stirring speech to Parliament in 1961, Madam Siong stated: “Many men marry more than one wife. Therefore, women do not enjoy full equality in the home. They do not enjoy political equality. When they are helpless, they are abandoned by their husbands and deprived of their basic rights.”

*
Inequality Among the Sexes
Madam Siong and other supporters of the new law argued that polygamy increased competition for wives because married men were still considered marriageable among single women. This competition drove down the age of the first marriage for women and increased the average age gap between spouses.
Consequently, the supply of unmarried women was lower, so men would pursue younger women than they might normally pursue.
Supporters of the Women’s Charter also argued that Singapore’s existing laws that allowed polygamy had the effect of creating an environment in which men would use whatever connections they had – including financial and reciprocal bargaining with the families of single women – to compete with other men to obtain wives.

*
Social Consequences of Polygamy
This led to a suppression of personal freedoms for women and female children, cultural rigidity,  higher gender inequality, and a rise in domestic violence. Women suffered a loss of influence in household decision-making and, because the average age of first marriage was lower, an increase in fertility.
Another problem was competition between women within a polygamous household. Multiple wives tended to fall into the “senior” and “junior” categories, which naturally led to sexual competition between women for the favor of the husband.
Senior wives, who tended to be older, often found it difficult to compete against the youth and beauty of junior wives. At the same time, junior wives often were jealous of the perceived higher status of senior wives. This often led to much acrimony in the household.
Polygamy also was harmful to children born into these households. Due to the heightened competition and resulting disharmony, the welfare of children often was neglected.  Playing favorites among children has always wreaked mental havoc among all involved, not to imagine the effects of playing favorites among wives.
Supporters of the Women’s Charter pointed to the need for a woman to be regarded as the mistress of her own home, something that was impossible when she had to share a home and compete against other women for the attention and favor of the husband.

*
Benefits of Monogamy
Since the Women’s Charter was passed, there have been many positive changes to the typical home structure in Singapore. There is less pressure to bring younger brides to the marriage market, for one. Plus, the spousal age gap has narrowed, and there are fewer instances of men controlling – in the guise of protecting – women.
There also has been more gender equality and more natural fertility levels.

*
Muslim Polygamy in Singapore
Today, polygamy has been eliminated for most of the general population. But it is still allowed under Muslim law, although it is regulated.  Muslim men can take more than one wife only if they receive approval from a Kadi, a Muslim religious leader. According to the Registry of Muslim Marriages, a man seeking to take more than one wife must meet certain strict financial requirements and the process must be carefully reviewed by a Kadi. Both parties must be interviewed separately before the Kadi makes his final decision on whether or not to approve the marriage.

*

Hmmmmmm.  What could possibly go wrong with only the wealthy being allowed polygamy???  What could possibly go wrong with denying poor males access to marriageable females in the culture of their birth???